Recovered material
What was recovered, from which feedstock, and how the output is defined for buyer or processor reporting.
Sustainability measurement
Turn recycling process evidence into sustainability claims buyers can defend.
Impact Recycling is not only claiming circularity. The differentiator is measurement: connecting separation evidence, QA testing, Life Cycle Analysis, End of Waste, PRN and sampling records to the reporting questions prospects already face.
What prospects need to report
Sustainability buyers need defensible inputs, not loose environmental language.
Processors, brands and reporting teams face consistent questions when assessing recovered-material claims. Each category below sets out what Impact Recycling's evidence covers.
Output quality
Purity, consistency and testing process evidence that can support material acceptance and procurement questions.
Destination and offtake
Where recovered material goes next, and whether the route supports a credible circularity claim.
Carbon method
The Life Cycle Analysis assumptions, boundary and calculation method behind any CO2 or avoided-impact statement.
Regulatory status
End of Waste, PRN and sampling evidence, stated only with the exact current regulatory wording approved.
How Impact measures
A chain of evidence from feedstock to reporting-ready claim.
Impact Recycling's water-based BOSS separation process generates evidence spanning feedstock characterisation, high-purity flake output, QA testing, End of Waste, PRN, BS EN 15343 and load-by-load sampling records.
Measurement flow
- 1. Characterise feedstock before setting public claims.
- 2. Capture BOSS process data for the relevant stream and deployment context.
- 3. Test recovered output for purity, consistency and buyer specification.
- 4. Record End of Waste, PRN and BS EN 15343 evidence where applicable.
- 5. Connect load-by-load sampling and QA records to the claim being made.
- 6. Document LCA assumptions before publishing carbon or diversion outcomes.
Differentiator
Measurement translates technical recycling work into buyer-side confidence.
A procurement or ESG team needs to know what changed, how it was measured, what evidence supports it, and which wording is safe to repeat. Impact Recycling's measurement competence means that answer exists before a claim is published.
What buyers get
Reporting-ready evidence summaries for commercial and sustainability teams.
The output is not a broad green claim. It is a structured evidence summary that can support internal ESG reporting, customer questionnaires, procurement due diligence and substantiated circularity claims.
ESG and sustainability reporting
Evidence that can support internal reporting, annual sustainability narratives and customer questionnaires.
Procurement due diligence
Clear material, quality and route information for buyers assessing recycled-content or circularity options.
Substantiated claims
A disciplined route from process record to public wording, reducing the risk of overclaiming.
Evidence areas
Regulatory and quality evidence areas.
Impact Recycling maintains structured evidence across End of Waste, PRN and Life Cycle Analysis — the three areas procurement and ESG teams most commonly need to interrogate.
EoW
End of Waste evidence and exact regulator wording
PRN
PRN status, BS EN 15343 and load-by-load sampling
Source: Environment Agency: Packaging Recovery Notes (GOV.UK)
LCA
Life Cycle Analysis method and carbon assumptions
FAQ
Sustainability evidence questions.
Common questions from commercial, procurement and ESG teams before they rely on recovered-material claims.
A defensible claim should connect the feedstock, recovered output, QA testing, destination, regulatory status and any Life Cycle Analysis assumptions. Impact Recycling treats these as source records that must be matched to the exact wording being published.
Carbon or avoided-impact claims are supported when the Life Cycle Analysis boundary, calculation method, comparison case and source records are documented. The ISO 14040/14044 framework sets the standard for how those boundaries and assumptions should be stated.
End of Waste status determines whether recovered material is legally classified as a product rather than waste. PRN evidence supports packaging compliance obligations. BS EN 15343 sets the traceability and recycled-content calculation method that procurement teams and brand auditors rely on.
See also: End of Waste criteria (GOV.UK), Packaging producer responsibilities (GOV.UK)
Evidence led
Bring the data behind the claim.
Impact can frame BOSS conversations around feedstock, output quality, QA, LCA assumptions, regulatory evidence and the reporting use case the buyer needs to satisfy.
Licence & deploy Bring BOSS into a processing conversation. Scope feedstock, site constraints and the evidence route for a licensed deployment. Talk to the team Buy recycled material Source BOSS-separated PCR with full traceability. UK-processed PE and PP with documented chain of custody — competitively priced against virgin and imported alternatives. Enquire about supply Technology proof See how density-led separation works. Review the technical principles before moving into validation, trials or commercial modelling. How BOSS works